Abstract

The work presented is the result of an ongoing European H2020 project entitled DR-BOB Demand Response in Blocks of Buildings (DR-BOB) that seeks to integrate existing technologies to create a scalable solution for Demand Response (DR) in blocks of buildings. In most EU countries, DR programs are currently limited to the industrial sector and to direct asset control. The DR-BOB solution extends applicability to the building sector, providing predictive building management in blocks of buildings, enabling facilities managers to respond to implicit and explicit DR schemes, and enabling the aggregation of the DR potential of many blocks of buildings for use in demand response markets. The solution consists of three main components: the Local Energy Manager (LEM), which adds intelligence and provides the capacity for predictive building management in blocks of buildings, a Consumer Portal (CP) to enable building managers and building occupants to interact with the system and be engaged in demand response operations, and a Decentralized Energy Management System (DEMS®, Siemens plc, Nottingham, England, UK), which enables the aggregation of the DR potential of many blocks of buildings, thus allowing participation in incentive-based demand response with or without an aggregator. The paper reports the key results around Business Modelling development for demand response products and services enabled by the DR-BOB solution. The scope is threefold: (1) illustrate how the functionality of the demand response solution can provide value proposition to underpin its exploitation by four specific customer segments, namely aggregators and three types of Owners of Blocks of Buildings in different market conditions, (2) explore key aspects of the Business Model from the point of view of a demand response solution provider, in particular around most the suitable revenue stream and key partnership, and (3) assess the importance of key variables such as market maturity, user engagement, and type of blocks of buildings as drivers to market penetration and profitability. The work presented is framed by the expected evolution of DR services in different market contexts and the different relationships between the main stakeholders involved in the DR value chain in different EU countries. The analysis also relies on the results of interviews conducted at the fours pilot sites of the DR-BOB project with key representatives of the management, operations, and marketing. These are used to better understand customer needs and sharpen the value proposition.

Highlights

  • The European Commission (EC) has set targets for 2020 including a 20% reduction in greenhouse gas emissions, a 20% increase of the share of renewable energy sources (RES), and a 20% improvement in energy efficiency [1]

  • The lack or uncertainty of the regulatory framework is a significant barrier to the development of Demand Response (DR) [6,7]; Many markets are currently oriented toward low-risk direct load control solutions: In countries were DR services are present, aggregators are not interested in the tertiary sector, preferring industrial direct load control [8], which is characterized by lower risk; Implicit vs. explicit DR: Flexibility can be used for both implicit/cost-based DR or for explicit/incentive-based DR [9], but not at the same time

  • Blocks of Buildings (BOB)) and from a limited number of associated services. This because the provision of services associated to the BOB, such as installation of Local Energy Manager (LEM) and Consumer Portal (CP), customer support, and maintenance and upgrades, should be part of the agreement between the aggregator and the BOB Owner and should not involve directly the Demand Response in Blocks of Buildings (DR-BOB)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The European Commission (EC) has set targets for 2020 including a 20% reduction in greenhouse gas emissions (from 1990 levels), a 20% increase of the share of renewable energy sources (RES), and a 20% improvement in energy efficiency [1]. Blocks of Buildings (BOB) might provide the right scale to participate in DR-programs because when compared to single buildings, they offer more flexibility in timing of energy usage, local energy generation, and energy storage with potentially exploitable assets and synergies To test this potential, the EC-funded project. DR-BOB (GA No 696114) seeks to integrate existing technologies to create a scalable solution that enables DR operations in buildings consisting of different blocks These technologies are a Decentralized Energy Management System (DEMS® ) provided by Siemens, a Local Energy Manager (LEM) from Teesside University (outcome of the IDEAS EU-funded project), and a Consumer Portal (CP) that was developed based on the GridPocket EcoTroksTM (GridPocket SAS, Sophia-Antipolis, France) tool.

Challenges for Business Model Development
Overall Methodology
Methodology
The DR-BOB Added Value
Identified Customer Segments and Business Models
Implementation in Use Cases
UK Pilot Site—Teesside University
Romanian Pilot Site—Technical University of Cluj-Napoca
Methodology for Cost-Benefit Analysis
Key Findings from Phase 1
Findings
Conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call