Abstract

The influenza B virus BM2 proton-selective ion channel is essential for virus uncoating, a process that occurs in the acidic environment of the endosome. The BM2 channel causes acidification of the interior of the virus particle, which results in dissociation of the viral membrane protein from the ribonucleo-protein core. The BM2 protein is similar to the A/M2 protein ion channel of influenza A virus (A/M2) in that it contains an HXXXW motif. Unlike the A/M2 protein, the BM2 protein is not inhibited by the antiviral drug amantadine. We used mutagenesis to ascertain the pore-lining residues of the BM2 ion channel. The specific activity (relative to wild type), reversal voltage, and susceptibility to modification by (2-aminoethyl)-methane thiosulfonate and N-ethylmaleimide of cysteine mutant proteins were measured in oocytes. It was found that mutation of transmembrane domain residues Ser(9), Ser(12), Phe(13), Ser(16), His(19), and Trp(23) to cysteine were most disruptive for ion channel function. These cysteine mutants were also most susceptible to (2-aminoethyl)-methane thiosulfonate and N-ethylmaleimide modification. Furthermore, considerable amounts of dimer were formed in the absence of oxidative reagents when cysteine was introduced at positions Ser(9), Ser(12), Ser(16), or Trp(23). Based on these experimental data, a BM2 transmembrane domain model is proposed. The presence of polar residues in the pore is a probable explanation for the amantadine insensitivity of the BM2 protein and suggests that related but more polar compounds might serve as useful inhibitors of the protein.

Highlights

  • Relative Specific Activity of Cysteine Substitution Mutant Ion Channels—The goal of these experiments was to identify the amino acid residues that line the pore of the BM2 ion channel

  • The single channel conductance and open probability are the best measures of ion channel activity, but in previous studies, it was found that the single channel conductance of the A/M2 ion channel is too low to be measured [29, 36]

  • It is likely that the single channel conductance of the BM2 ion channel is very low

Read more

Summary

Introduction

It has been suggested that the failure of amantadine to inhibit the BM2 channel is due to differences in the transmembrane (TM) domain pore-lining residues [9], but these residues have not yet been identified. It has been demonstrated in many ways that the ion channel activity of the A/M2 protein is intrinsic [2, 11, 12]. An essential foundation for both of these studies was prior biochemical information about the A/M2 channel, its pore-lining residues [15,16,17] and its active oligomeric state [18]. Alignment of conserved histidine and tryptophan residues of the TM domains of the A/M2 and BM2 proteins

Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call