Abstract
With the advent of the Internet era, webcasting has become a way for some people to make quick money, in which the audience's reward for the anchor has become an important source of income for the anchor. The rapid rise of the live broadcasting industry has made the number of network live broadcasting crimes rising, and the crime of the anchor inducing the audience to reward has become a new type of network fraud. However, there are differences in the legal profession on the identification of the nature of the behavior of network live streaming type of reward, such as whether or not there is a quid pro quo or what kind of quid pro quo, and whether or not there is a direct agreement between the anchor and the user at the time of rewarding, and so on. The root of the problem is that there are differences in the determination of the legal relationship. Based on this, this paper will define the rights and obligations between the user, anchor, live platform tripartite relationship and the legal nature of the network live reward behavior and reward fraud crimes to analyze and identify, and according to the different groups oriented to put forward reasonable preventive countermeasures.
Published Version (
Free)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
