Abstract

Simple SummaryClassifying a target population at the genetic level can provide important information for the preservation and commercial use of a breed. In this study, the minimum number of markers was used in combination, to distinguish target populations based on high-density single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) array data. Subsequently, a genome-wide association study for filtering target-population-specific SNPs between the case and control groups and principal component analysis with machine learning algorithms could be used to explore various combinations with the minimum number of markers. In addition, the optimal combination of SNP markers was able to produce stable results for the target population in verification studies, in which samples were analyzed.A marker combination capable of classifying a specific chicken population could improve commercial value by increasing consumer confidence with respect to the origin of the population. This would facilitate the protection of native genetic resources in the market of each country. In this study, a total of 283 samples from 20 lines, which consisted of Korean native chickens, commercial native chickens, and commercial broilers with a layer population, were analyzed to determine the optimal marker combination comprising the minimum number of markers, using a 600 k high-density single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) array. Machine learning algorithms, a genome-wide association study (GWAS), linkage disequilibrium (LD) analysis, and principal component analysis (PCA) were used to distinguish a target (case) group for comparison with control chicken groups. In the processing of marker selection, a total of 47,303 SNPs were used for classifying chicken populations; 96 LD-pruned SNPs (50 SNPs per LD block) served as the best marker combination for target chicken classification. Moreover, 36, 44, and 8 SNPs were selected as the minimum numbers of markers by the AdaBoost (AB), Random Forest (RF), and Decision Tree (DT) machine learning classification models, which had accuracy rates of 99.6%, 98.0%, and 97.9%, respectively. The selected marker combinations increased the genetic distance and fixation index (Fst) values between the case and control groups, and they reduced the number of genetic components required, confirming that efficient classification of the groups was possible by using a small number of marker sets. In a verification study including additional chicken breeds and samples (12 lines and 182 samples), the accuracy did not significantly change, and the target chicken group could be clearly distinguished from the other populations. The GWAS, PCA, and machine learning algorithms used in this study can be applied efficiently, to determine the optimal marker combination with the minimum number of markers that can distinguish the target population among a large number of SNP markers.

Highlights

  • IntroductionThe consumption of chicken has increased globally due to increased consumer interest in health; consumption is rising annually in Korea [1]

  • Chicken is a rich source of protein in the human diet

  • The purpose of this study was to identify the minimum number of single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) markers needed to identify and verify a target chicken population from among other populations, using information obtained from a 600 k SNP genotyping array for chicken

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The consumption of chicken has increased globally due to increased consumer interest in health; consumption is rising annually in Korea [1]. Many chicken breeds with improved quality have been produced, but methods are required to certify them at the genetic level. The methods used to identify chicken breeds are based on morphological features, but meat products already on the market cannot be identified by their morphological characteristics. A precise identification method allowing for verification at the genetic level is required. The Korean government is currently developing genetic markers that can distinguish cattle, pig, and chicken breeds [3,4,5].

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call