Abstract

The municipal solid waste disposal site (MSWDS) selection process is a complex multi-criteria decision-making problem, which requires consideration of a wide spectrum of physical information, legal requirements, and constraints that should satisfy the expectations of a number of stakeholders with conflicting opinions or interests. In this paper, analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and geographic information system (GIS) techniques were jointly used to identify suitable MSWDSs for the Metropolitan Mersin (SE Turkey) utilizing 12 decision criteria (i.e., lithology, aquifer type, distance from lineaments, distance from landslides, land use, distance from settlements, distance from roads, distance from surface waters, distance from springs and wells, elevation, aspect, and slope). For assessment of site suitability, selected decision criteria (i.e., raster-based thematic map layers) were integrated in the GIS environment using the weighted linear combination aggregation method after standardizing and assigning weights to each criterion using AHP technique. The classified suitability map indicates that 0.73 % of the study area is most suitable, 2.75 % is suitable, 3.39 % is moderately suitable, 4.77 % is poorly suitable, 3.47 % is least suitable, and 84.89 % is completely unsuitable (i.e., restricted areas) for siting MSWDSs. Before the final decision is made, detailed field investigations must be carried out at the candidate sites to protect water resources and land.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.