Abstract
Because of their frequent isolation in the routine laboratory and their increasing clinical significance, fast and accurate species identification of staphylococci may be required; this can only be achieved by automated systems. A total of 147 clinical isolates (52 Staphylococcus aureus, 50 Staphylococcus epidermidis, and 45 other coagulase-negative staphylococci [CoNS]) were first identified by molecular methodology and then comparatively tested by Vitek 2 (new colorimetric identification card) and Phoenix using the novel 0.25 McFarland and the standard 0.50 McFarland inoculum protocols. All S. aureus isolates were accurately identified. Vitek 2 identified correctly all S. epidermidis and 93.3% of the other CoNS, whereas the respective rates were 86% and 82.2% for Phoenix's standard and 92% and 82.2% for the novel protocol. It appears that both systems provide excellent identification of S. aureus, but Vitek 2 recognizes CoNS species more accurately than Phoenix. The 0.25 McFarland protocol does not improve system performance.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.