Identification of specific causes of myelopathy in a large cohort of patients initially diagnosed with transverse myelitis

Abstract

Background and objectivesIdentifying the etiologic diagnosis in patients presenting with myelopathy is essential in order to guide appropriate treatment and follow-up. We set out to examine the etiologic diagnosis after comprehensive clinical evaluation and diagnostic work-up in a large cohort of patients referred to our specialized myelopathy clinic, and to explore the demographic profiles and symptomatic evolution of specific etiologic diagnoses. MethodsIn this retrospective study of patients referred to the Johns Hopkins Myelitis and Myelopathy Center between 2006 and 2021 for evaluation of “transverse myelitis”,the final etiologic diagnosis determined after comprehensive evaluation in each patient was reviewed and validated. Demographic characteristics and temporal profile of symptom evolution were recorded. ResultsOf 1193 included patients, 772 (65%) were determined to have an inflammatory myelopathy and 421 (35%) were determined to have a non-inflammatory myelopathy. Multiple sclerosis/clinically isolated syndrome (n = 221, 29%) and idiopathic myelitis (n = 149, 19%) were the most frequent inflammatory diagnoses, while spinal cord infarction (n = 197, 47%) and structural causes of myelopathy (n = 108, 26%) were the most frequent non-inflammatory diagnoses. Compared to patients with inflammatory myelopathies, patients with non-inflammatory myelopathies were more likely to be older, male and experience chronic symptom evolution (p < 0.001 for all). Hyperacute symptom evolution was most frequent in patients with spinal cord infarction (74%), while chronic symptom evolution was most frequent in patients with structural causes of myelopathy (81%), arteriovenous fistula or arteriovenous malformation (81%), myelopathy associated with rheumatologic disorder (71%), and sarcoidosis-associated myelopathy (61%). ConclusionsPatients initially diagnosed with “transverse myelitis” are eventually found to have a more specific inflammatory or even non-inflammatory cause, potentially resulting in inappropriate treatment and follow-up. Demographic characteristics and temporal profile of symptom evolution may help inform a differential diagnosis in these patients. Etiological diagnosis of myelopathies would provide better therapeutic decisions.