Abstract
We have scanned the inorganic crystal structure database using Voronoi‐Dirichlet methodology for inorganic, crystalline, solid Na electrolytes and applied a total of nine different crystallographic and economic parameters in order to evaluate the potential of each material. Especially for stationary electrochemical energy storage — used to counteract the capricious nature of renewable energy sources and momentary variations of energy consumption — Na‐based chemistries have a considerable market share. They rely on solid Na electrolytes separating the Na and S electrode compartments. We used data generated from the currently widest‐spread Na electrolytes to lay a foundation for the crystallographic data mining and Voronoi‐Dirichlet partitioning of the database. The structural data is the basis for the calculation of the above‐mentioned parameters. We introduced an evaluation and scoring scheme to systematise the results and — depending on the weighting scheme — point towards the most promising materials. Aluminosilicates and transition metal oxides seem especially interesting but, depending on the weighting, any of the more than 400 candidates could be the next‐generation solid Na electrolyte.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.