Identification of prosthetic joint infections with 16S amplicon metagenomic sequencing – comparison with standard cultivation approach

Abstract

Prosthetic joint infections (PJIs) are commonly diagnosed via culture-based methods, which may miss hard-to-grow pathogens. This study contrasts amplicon metagenomic sequencing (16S AS) with traditional culture techniques for enhanced clinical decision-making. We analyzed sonicate fluid from 27 patients undergoing revision arthroplasty using both methods, emphasizing the distinction between contaminants and true positives. Our findings show moderate agreement between the two methods, with a Cohen's kappa of 0.490, varying across bacterial genera (Cohen's kappa -0.059 to 1). The sensitivity of 16S AS compared to culture was 81% (95% CI, 68% to 94%). Sequencing revealed greater microbial diversity, including anaerobic genera like Anaerococcus and Citrobacter. Interestingly, several culture-negative PJI samples showed diverse bacteria via 16S AS. Despite rigorous controls and algorithms to eliminate contaminants, confirming bacteria presence with 16S AS remains a challenge. This highlights the need for improved PJI diagnostic methods, while also pointing out the limitations of next-generation sequencing (NGS) as a clinical diagnostic tool.