Abstract
The purpose of this study was to define the optimal scoring method for identifying benign intrapulmonary lymph nodes. Subjects for this study were selected from the COPDGene study, a large multicenter longitudinal observational cohort study. A retrospective case-control analysis was performed using identified nodules on a subset of 377 patients who demonstrated 765 pulmonary nodules on their baseline computed tomography (CT) study. Nodule characteristics of 636 benign nodules (which resolved or showed <20% growth rate at 5 y follow-up) were compared with 51 nodules that occurred in the same lobe as a reported malignancy. Two radiologists scored each pulmonary nodule on the basis of intrapulmonary lymph node characteristics. A simple scoring strategy weighing all characteristics equally was compared with an optimized scoring strategy that weighed characteristics on the basis of their relative importance in identifying benign pulmonary nodules. A total of 479 of 636 benign pulmonary nodules had the majority of lymph node characteristics, whereas only 1 subpleural nodule with the majority of lymph node characteristics appeared to be malignant. Only 279 of 479 (58%) of benign pulmonary nodules with the majority of lymph node characteristics were intrafissural or subpleural. The optimized scoring strategy showed improved performance compared with the simple scoring strategy with average area under the curve of 0.80 versus 0.55. Optimized cutoff scores showed negative likelihood values for both readers of <0.2. A simulation showed a potential reduction in CT utilization of up to 36% for Fleischner criteria and up to 5% for LUNG-RADS. Nodules with the majority of lymph node characteristics, regardless of location, are likely benign, and weighing certain lymph node characteristics greater than others can improve overall performance. Given the potential to reduce CT utilization, lymph node characteristics should be considered when recommending appropriate follow-up.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.