Abstract

In ultra-wideband (UWB)-based wireless ranging or distance measurement, differentiation between line-of-sight (LOS), non-line-of-sight (NLOS), and multi-path (MP) conditions is important for precise indoor localization. This is because the accuracy of the reported measured distance in UWB ranging systems is directly affected by the measurement conditions (LOS, NLOS, or MP). However, the major contributions in the literature only address the binary classification between LOS and NLOS in UWB ranging systems. The MP condition is usually ignored. In fact, the MP condition also has a significant impact on the ranging errors of the UWB compared to the direct LOS measurement results. However, the magnitudes of the error contained in MP conditions are generally lower than completely blocked NLOS scenarios. This paper addresses machine learning techniques for identification of the three mentioned classes (LOS, NLOS, and MP) in the UWB indoor localization system using an experimental dataset. The dataset was collected in different conditions in different scenarios in indoor environments. Using the collected real measurement data, we compared three machine learning (ML) classifiers, i.e., support vector machine (SVM), random forest (RF) based on an ensemble learning method, and multilayer perceptron (MLP) based on a deep artificial neural network, in terms of their performance. The results showed that applying ML methods in UWB ranging systems was effective in the identification of the above-three mentioned classes. Specifically, the overall accuracy reached up to 91.9% in the best-case scenario and 72.9% in the worst-case scenario. Regarding the F1-score, it was 0.92 in the best-case and 0.69 in the worst-case scenario. For reproducible results and further exploration, we provide the publicly accessible experimental research data discussed in this paper at PUB (Publications at Bielefeld University). The evaluations of the three classifiers are conducted using the open-source Python machine learning library scikit-learn.

Highlights

  • Indoor localization systems enable several potential applications in diverse fields

  • This section examines the experimental evaluation results of three machine learning (ML) classifiers based on two quantitative metrics: (i) an F1-score, which was used to compare the performance of the three evaluated classifiers in this paper (Section 7.1), and (ii) a confusion matrix that gave an insightful representation of the reported results for each individual classifier (Section 7.2)

  • The experimental evaluation results based on the F1-score proved that ML-based classifiers could identify the defined three classes with a high score, i.e., 0.69 in the worst-case scenario and 0.92 in the best-case scenario

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Indoor localization systems enable several potential applications in diverse fields. A few examples where positioning is crucial include tracking valuable assets and personal devices in IoT, ambient assisted living systems in smart homes and hospitals, logistics, autonomous driving systems, customer tracking systems in shopping and public areas, positioning systems in industrial environments, and mission-critical systems such as an application for firefighters and soldiers [1,2,3]. Sci. 2020, 10, 3980 technology [1,4,5] plays an increasingly important role in precise indoor localization systems due to its fine ranging resolution and obstacle-penetration capabilities [2,3,6]. In wireless ranging systems including UWB technology, the distance between the transmitter and receiver is estimated by measuring the time-of-flight (TOF) between the two transceivers and multiplying it by the speed of light [7,8]. Non-line-of-sight (NLOS) [9,10,11] and multi-path (MP) [3] conditions cause a positive bias in the estimated distances.

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call