Abstract

To evaluate different methods for the identification of methicillin-resistant Staphylococci and their reliability, 112 Staphylococcal isolates (32 Staphylococcus aureus isolates and 80 coagulase negative Staphylococci isolates “CoNS”) were collected from 118 nasal swab cultures and were subjected to three methods to detect oxacillin susceptibility of the isolates. The three methods were oxacillin disk diffusion method; the Epsilometer- test (E-test) and polymerase chain reaction (PCR). For the S. aureus strains, the E-test and the PCR methods showed discrepant results in two isolates (6.25%); that showed susceptible patterns with the E-test, but were resistant by the disk diffusion method. Both isolates were negative for the presence of mecA gene. Seven (8.75%) out of the 80 CoNS isolates showed conflicting results where four isolates showed resistance with the disk diffusion and the E-test methods, and had negative mecA gene by PCR. Three of the 7 CoNS with the conflicting results showed a susceptible pattern to oxacillin by the E-test method, while the PCR method showed the presence of mecA gene. We concluded that combination of molecular and conventional methods should be used to assess methicillin resistance of Staphylococci in clinical practices.

Highlights

  • The incidence of infections caused by methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is increasing which require rapid and accurate detection[1, 2]

  • The susceptibility patterns among the eightycoagulase negative samples were as follow: 69 isolates (86.2%) were resistant to Oxacillin and the other 11 isolates (13.8%) were susceptible

  • Table1: Antimicrobial Susceptibility patterns among coagulase positive and coagulase negative isolates as measured by disk diffusion method

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The incidence of infections caused by methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is increasing which require rapid and accurate detection[1, 2]. Oxacillin disk diffusion: The isolated Staphylococcus strains were tested for their susceptibilities to oxacillin and other antibiotics following previously reported method[14].

Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.