Abstract

1-Aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid (ACC), a biosynthetic precursor of ethylene, has long been proposed to act as a mobile messenger in higher plants. However, little is known about the transport system of ACC. Recently, our genetic characterization of an ACC-resistant mutant with normal ethylene sensitivity revealed that lysine histidine transporter 1 (LHT1) functions as a transporter of ACC. As amino acid transporters might have broad substrate specificity, we hypothesized that other amino acid transporters including LHT1 paralogs might have the ACC-transporter activity. Here, we took a gain-of-function approach by transgenic complementation of lht1 mutant with a selected set of amino acid transporters. When we introduced transgene into the lht1 mutant, the transgenic expression of LHT2, but not of LHT3 or amino acid permease 5 (AAP5), restored the ACC resistance phenotype of the lht1 mutant. The result provides genetic evidence that some, if not all, amino acid transporters in Arabidopsis can function as ACC transporters. In support, when expressed in Xenopus laevis oocytes, both LHT1 and LHT2 exhibited ACC-transporting activity, inducing inward current upon addition of ACC. Interestingly, the transgenic expression of LHT2, but not of LHT3 or AAP5, could also suppress the early senescence phenotypes of the lht1 mutant. Taking together, we propose that plants have evolved a multitude of ACC transporters based on amino acid transporters, which would contribute to the differential distribution of ACC under various spatiotemporal contexts.

Highlights

  • Transporters of plant hormones play a pivotal role in cell-cell communication, underpinning tissue-specific differentiation and environmental adaptation of higher plants, as exemplified by various defects of hormone-transporter mutants throughout the life cycle (Park et al, 2017; Do et al, 2018)

  • With the assumption that other amino acid transporters take part in the uptake of the d-amino acids, substrates of lysine histidine transporter 1 (LHT1), we investigated whether d-amino acid resistance of the lht1 mutant could be restored by transgenic overexpression of LHT2, LHT3, FIGURE 2 | Transgenic complementation of lht1-101 by overexpression of LHT2, LHT3, or amino acid permease 5 (AAP5). (A) Restored ACC response of lht1-101 mutant by overexpression of LHT2

  • The molecular nature of ACC-transporting system has remained elusive until recent genetic identification of lht1-101, as an ACC-resistant mutant (Shin et al, 2015)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Transporters of plant hormones play a pivotal role in cell-cell communication, underpinning tissue-specific differentiation and environmental adaptation of higher plants, as exemplified by various defects of hormone-transporter mutants throughout the life cycle (Park et al, 2017; Do et al, 2018). Many transporters implicated in the uptake of metabolites/nutrients take part in hormonal transport (Tsay et al, 1993; Huang et al, 1999; Krouk et al, 2010; Kanno et al, 2012) Despite such progress, we are still far from a comprehensive understanding of the components of hormone transport systems and their regulatory mechanisms (Park et al, 2017). The triple response of ethylene-treated etiolated seedlings, including apical hook exaggeration, inhibition of root growth, and shortened hypocotyl, represents one of the best characterized ethylene responses It has been instrumentally exploited for genetic identification of key components of ethylene biosynthesis and signaling (Guzman and Ecker, 1990; Ju and Chang, 2015; Merchante and Stepanova, 2017). Since the first identification of ethylene-insensitive etr mutant (Bleecker et al, 1988), molecular genetic analyses in Arabidopsis have well established how plant perceive and respond to ethylene via core signaling module, which comprised five components, including ethylene receptors (ETR1 and its paralogs)-constitutive triple response1-ethylene insensitive 2-EIN3 binding F-Box 1 (EBF1)/EBF2-ethylene insensitive 3 (EIN3)/EIN3-like (Ju and Chang, 2015; Merchante and Stepanova, 2017)

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call