Abstract
This chapter presents the design of a controller that ensures both the robust stability and robust performance of a physical plant using a linearized identified model . The structure of the plant and the statistics of the noise and disturbances affecting the plant are assumed to be unknown. As the design of the robust controller relies on the availability of a plant model, the mathematical model of the plant is first identified and the identified model, termed here the nominal model, is then employed in the controller design. As an effective design of the robust controller relies heavily on an accurately identified model of the plant, a reliable identification scheme is developed here to handle unknown model structures and statistics of the noise and disturbances. Using a mixed-sensitivity H∞ optimization framework, a robust controller is designed with the plant uncertainty modeled by additive perturbations in the numerator and denominator polynomials of the identified plant model. The proposed identification and robust controller design are evaluated extensively on simulated systems as well as on two laboratory-scale physical systems, namely the magnetic levitation and twotank liquid level systems. In order to appreciate the importance of the identification stage and the interplay between this stage and the robust controller design stage, let us first consider a model of an electro-mechanical system formed of a DC motor relating the input voltage to the armature and the output angular velocity. Based on the physical laws, it is a third-order closed-loop system formed of fast electrical and slow mechanical subsystems. It is very difficult to identify the fast dynamics of this system, and hence the identified model will be of a second-order while the true order remains to be three. Besides this error in the model order, there may also be errors in the estimated model parameters. Consider now the problem of designing a controller for this electro-mechanical system. A constant-gain controller based on the identified second-order model will be stable for all values of the gain as long the negative feedback is used. If, however, the constant gain controller is implemented on the physical system, the true closed-loop third-order system may not be stable for large values of the controller gain. This simple example clearly shows the disparity between the performance of the identified system and the real one and hence provides a strong motivation for designing a robust controller which factors uncertainties in the model.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have