Abstract
Vigorous debates as to the evolutionary origins of culture remain unresolved due to an absence of methods for identifying learning mechanisms in natural populations. While laboratory experiments on captive animals have revealed evidence for a number of mechanisms, these may not necessarily reflect the processes typically operating in nature. We developed a novel method that allows social and asocial learning mechanisms to be determined in animal groups from the patterns of interaction with, and solving of, a task. We deployed it to analyse learning in groups of wild meerkats (Suricata suricatta) presented with a novel foraging apparatus. We identify nine separate learning processes underlying the meerkats’ foraging behaviour, in each case precisely quantifying their strength and duration, including local enhancement, emulation, and a hitherto unrecognized form of social learning, which we term ‘observational perseverance’. Our analysis suggests a key factor underlying the stability of behavioural traditions is a high ratio of specific to generalized social learning effects. The approach has widespread potential as an ecologically valid tool to investigate learning mechanisms in natural groups of animals, including humans.
Highlights
It is widely agreed that scientific endeavours to understand the evolutionary roots of human culture require knowledge of the extent to which the social transmission of information in human and non-human societies relies on homologous mechanisms [1,2,3]
Our methodology allows us to determine for the first time the social and asocial learning mechanisms operating in the wild, but the methods could be applied to captive groups
Social factors played critical roles in drawing meerkats to interact with the apparatus, and keeping them at the task, while asocial learning processes dominated task acquisition
Summary
It is widely agreed that scientific endeavours to understand the evolutionary roots of human culture require knowledge of the extent to which the social transmission of information in human and non-human societies relies on homologous mechanisms [1,2,3]. The subjects’ performance is assessed in a subsequent test phase, in which they are given access to the task, to ascertain whether acquisition of the behaviour has been improved as a result of the observational experience, compared to control subjects. This traditional social learning experiment design ( ‘traditional approach’) has been modified in various ways to isolate different social learning mechanisms, taking advantage of the fact that the experimenter has a high degree of control over what social cues are available to the observers [4]
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.