Abstract

Peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) is an important food and oilseed crop worldwide. Yield and quality can be significantly reduced by foliar fungal diseases, such as early and late leaf spot diseases. Acceptable levels of leaf spot resistance in cultivated peanut have been elusive due to environmental interactions and the proper combination of QTLs in any particular peanut genotype. Resistance gene analogs, as potential resistance (R)-genes, have unique roles in the recognition and activation of disease resistance responses. Novel R-genes can be identified by searches for conserved domains such as nucleotide binding site, leucine rich repeat, receptor like kinase, and receptor like protein from expressed genes or through genomic sequences. Expressed R-genes represent necessary plant signals in a disease response. The goals of this research are to identify expressed R-genes from cultivated peanuts that are naturally infected by early and late spot pathogens, compare these to the closest diploid progenitors, and evaluate specific gene expression in cultivated peanuts. Putative peanut R-genes (381) were available from a public database (NCBI). Primers were designed and PCR products were sequenced. A total of 214 sequences were produced which matched to proteins with the corresponding R-gene motifs. These R-genes were mapped to the genome sequences of Arachis duranensis and Arachis ipaensis, which are the closest diploid progenitors for tetraploid cultivated peanut, A. hypogaea. Identification and association of specific gene-expression will elucidate potential disease resistance mechanism in peanut and may facilitate the selection of breeding lines with high levels of leaf spot resistance.

Highlights

  • In response to different disease pressures, plants have evolved intricate recognition and signal transduction systems to ward off pathogens

  • The presence of the pathogen is first recognized by receptor like kinases (RLKs) and receptor like proteins (RLPs) which function as pattern recognition receptors (PRRs) in interactions called pathogen/microbeassociated molecular patterns (PAMP/MAMP) to activate a pattern-triggered immunity (PTI) response [1]

  • Primers were designed to cover a large segment of predicted open reading frame (ORF)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

In response to different disease pressures, plants have evolved intricate recognition and signal transduction systems to ward off pathogens. Plants have different layers of waxes, hairs or trichomes, and a cell wall that act as physical barriers against non-adapted pathogens. The presence of the pathogen is first recognized by receptor like kinases (RLKs) and receptor like proteins (RLPs) which function as pattern recognition receptors (PRRs) in interactions called pathogen/microbeassociated molecular patterns (PAMP/MAMP) to activate a pattern-triggered immunity (PTI) response [1]. Adapted pathogens can penetrate the cells to release pathogenic effector proteins and activate resistance (R) proteins of the host in a second line of defense, called effector triggered immunity (ETI) response [2]. In both PTI and ETI, plant activate an array of immune responses such

Objectives
Methods
Results
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call