Abstract

ContextIdentifying risk zones for wildlife-vehicle incidents is essential for creating effective mitigation efforts on major road networks. Wildlife-vehicle collision data are often used to identify hotspot areas without consideration of species spatial distributions.ObjectivesEvaluating both can reveal spatiotemporal patterns that can improve mitigation success.MethodsWe summarized elk-vehicle incident (EVI) data on State Route 20 (SR 20) in Washington State between 2012 and 2019. We also collared 23 elk residing in the vicinity of SR 20 and used GPS location data to identify home ranges and road crossings. We compared EVI and elk road crossing data to identify hotspot locations on SR 20 to help inform mitigation.ResultsOur EVI and elk crossing data had a non-random distribution along a 38 km section of SR 20 associated with the 95% home ranges of 8 female elk sub-herds. We found EVI data alone were an effective indicator of elk spatial distribution and movement in relation to collision hotspots along SR 20. Our results also indicated a strong association between elk crossings and EVIs by milepost. While the spatial distribution of elk sub-herds was a good predictor of EVI risk zones, EVI frequency was not associated with an increase in elk population.ConclusionsClassifying EVI and road crossing distributions as high risk zones is the first step preceding mitigation and protection measures to prevent elk-vehicle collisions. Specific identification of hotspots will result in more effective and successful installations of high cost mitigation efforts such as wildlife crossing structures.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call