Abstract

The observation of apparent power laws in neuronal systems has led to the suggestion that the brain is at, or close to, a critical state and may be a self-organised critical system. Within the framework of self-organised criticality a separation of timescales is thought to be crucial for the observation of power-law dynamics and computational models are often constructed with this property. However, this is not necessarily a characteristic of physiological neural networks—external input does not only occur when the network is at rest/a steady state. In this paper we study a simple neuronal network model driven by a continuous external input (i.e. the model does not have an explicit separation of timescales from seeding the system only when in the quiescent state) and analytically tuned to operate in the region of a critical state (it reaches the critical regime exactly in the absence of input—the case studied in the companion paper to this article). The system displays avalanche dynamics in the form of cascades of neuronal firing separated by periods of silence. We observe partial scale-free behaviour in the distribution of avalanche size for low levels of external input. We analytically derive the distributions of waiting times and investigate their temporal behaviour in relation to different levels of external input, showing that the system’s dynamics can exhibit partial long-range temporal correlations. We further show that as the system approaches the critical state by two alternative ‘routes’, different markers of criticality (partial scale-free behaviour and long-range temporal correlations) are displayed. This suggests that signatures of criticality exhibited by a particular system in close proximity to a critical state are dependent on the region in parameter space at which the system (currently) resides.

Highlights

  • In recent years, apparent power laws have been observed experimentally in neurophysiological data leading to the suggestion that the brain is a critical system [3, 4]

  • We did not carry out this testing here and it may be that such a process would suggest that a power law is not the best fit to the data

  • As discussed in the Introduction, long-range temporal correlations are another possible signature of a system at a critical state and have been observed in neurophysiological data [4, 11,12,13,14,15]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Apparent power laws (i.e. where a power law is the best model for the data using a model selection approach [1, 2]) have been observed experimentally in neurophysiological data leading to the suggestion that the brain is a critical system [3, 4]. As neuronal systems are necessarily finite this is an important question in the neuroscience field but one that has yet to be fully addressed Within experimental results this fact has been accounted for by the concept of finite-size effects—where a power law is observed up to a cut-off value [2, 5, 6, 19]. Recent experimental work has shown that waiting times between neuronal avalanches in cultures have a distribution with two trends—a (short) initial power-law region thought to relate to neuronal up-states and a bump in the distribution at longer waiting times thought to relate to neuronal down states [31] Could this difference in these waiting time distributions (between the SOC sand-pile model and the neuronal avalanches in culture) be explained by the fact that physiological neuronal systems do not have a separation of timescales?. Overall we find that the system displays different signatures of criticality depending on the region of the parameter space around the critical regime

The Model
Model Simulations and Burst Analysis
Distributions of Avalanche Size and Duration
Distribution of Consecutive Active to Quiescent Transitions
Probability Distribution of the Initial Number of Active Neurons
Generalisation to a System of Any Size N
Distribution of Single Quiescent to Active Transitions
The IAI Distribution
Statistical Comparison with a Power-Law Distribution
Discussion
Long-Range Temporal Correlations
Increasing the System Size
The Effect on LRTCs of Decreasing the Level of the External Input
Validity of the Model
Purely Excitatory Synaptic Transmission
The Activation Function
The Binning Approach
Validity of DFA and the Investigation of LRTCs
Partial Scale-Free Behaviour in Avalanche Size
Waiting Times
Dynamic Range and Power Laws
Two Routes to Criticality
Chialvo DR
20. Essam J
36. Hinrichsen H
41. Ross SM

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.