Abstract

BackgroundThe underlying strategies used by influenza A viruses (IAVs) to adapt to new hosts while crossing the species barrier are complex and yet to be understood completely. Several studies have been published identifying singular genomic signatures that indicate such a host switch. The complexity of the problem suggested that in addition to the singular signatures, there might be a combinatorial use of such genomic features, in nature, defining adaptation to hosts.ResultsWe used computational rule-based modeling to identify combinatorial sets of interacting amino acid (aa) residues in 12 proteins of IAVs of H1N1 and H3N2 subtypes. We built highly accurate rule-based models for each protein that could differentiate between viral aa sequences coming from avian and human hosts. We found 68 host-specific combinations of aa residues, potentially associated to host adaptation on HA, M1, M2, NP, NS1, NEP, PA, PA-X, PB1 and PB2 proteins of the H1N1 subtype and 24 on M1, M2, NEP, PB1 and PB2 proteins of the H3N2 subtypes. In addition to these combinations, we found 132 novel singular aa signatures distributed among all proteins, including the newly discovered PA-X protein, of both subtypes. We showed that HA, NA, NP, NS1, NEP, PA-X and PA proteins of the H1N1 subtype carry H1N1-specific and HA, NA, PA-X, PA, PB1-F2 and PB1 of the H3N2 subtype carry H3N2-specific signatures. M1, M2, PB1-F2, PB1 and PB2 of H1N1 subtype, in addition to H1N1 signatures, also carry H3N2 signatures. Similarly M1, M2, NP, NS1, NEP and PB2 of H3N2 subtype were shown to carry both H3N2 and H1N1 host-specific signatures (HSSs).ConclusionsTo sum it up, we computationally constructed simple IF-THEN rule-based models that could distinguish between aa sequences of avian and human IAVs. From the rules we identified HSSs having a potential to affect the adaptation to specific hosts. The identification of combinatorial HSSs suggests that the process of adaptation of IAVs to a new host is more complex than previously suggested. The present study provides a basis for further detailed studies with the aim to elucidate the molecular mechanisms providing the foundation for the adaptation process.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12864-016-2919-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Highlights

  • The underlying strategies used by influenza A viruses (IAVs) to adapt to new hosts while crossing the species barrier are complex and yet to be understood completely

  • Given our poor understanding of the host adaptation process of the virus, which can be a major factor for such epidemics and pandemics, it is very hard to predict the type of the virus that will cause the coming outbreaks

  • Combinatorial signatures As expected we found aa combinations, i.e. the combinatorial host-specific signatures (HSSs), in HA, matrix protein 1 (M1), matrix protein 2 (M2), NP, non-structural protein 1 (NS1), Nuclear export protein (NEP) (NS2), polymerase acidic protein (PA), PA-X, polymerase basic protein 1 (PB1) and polymerase basic protein 2 (PB2) proteins to be associated with specific hosts in the H1N1 subtype

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The underlying strategies used by influenza A viruses (IAVs) to adapt to new hosts while crossing the species barrier are complex and yet to be understood completely. The complexity of the problem suggested that in addition to the singular signatures, there might be a combinatorial use of such genomic features, in nature, defining adaptation to hosts. Influenza A viruses (IAVs) have been known for a long time to cause disease in a wide range of host species, including humans and various animals. The interspecies transmission requires that IAVs adapt to the new host and the whole process is facilitated by their high mutation rates [1] and their ability to readily reassort [2]. This can result in epidemics and pandemics with severe consequences for both human and animal life. Given our poor understanding of the host adaptation process of the virus, which can be a major factor for such epidemics and pandemics, it is very hard to predict the type of the virus that will cause the coming outbreaks

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call