Identification of categories of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health in functional assessment measures for stroke survivors: a systematic review

Abstract

Objective: Perform a systematic review to identify the categories of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health linked to the concepts measured by functional assessment tools validated for Brazilian Portuguese: Timed Up and Go test, Functional Independence Measure, Barthel Index, and Rivermead Mobility Index and Modified Rankin Scale.Methods: The Medline, Embase and CINAHL databases were consulted using a standardized search strategy. The studies were summarized using a pre-established set of specific criteria for the adequate linkage between the concepts identified in the assessment measures and the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health categories. Two independent reviewers performed the selection of the studies, data extraction and evaluation of the results.Results: The search of the databanks led to the retrieval of 99 studies. However, only six articles were included in the present review. The linkage results of the studies included in the review were divergent, likely due to the taxonomic complexity of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health, the difficulty in clearly relating the concepts of the assessment measures to the classifications and the fact that not all linkage rules were followed. “Activities and participation” was the most evaluated component, with mobility the most frequently covered category in the measures, followed by self-care. Among the measures analyzed, the Functional Independence Measure addresses a greater number of categories and therefore has the most concepts related to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health, followed by the Barthel Index, Modified Rankin Scale, Rivermead Mobility Index and Timed Up and Go test. The Modified Rankin Scale was the assessment tool that most evaluated categories related to environmental factors.Conclusion: The Functional Independence Measure has more concepts related to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health, since it addresses a greater number of categories. These findings can help guide health professionals in the selection of assessment tools for the evaluation of post-stroke functioning, making viable the use of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health categories in clinical practice and public health services.Implications for rehabilitationThis study standardized identification of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health categories in the main outcome measures used to assess post-stroke functional capacity.Functional Independence Measure has more concepts related to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health compared to other functional assessment instruments.Findings can enable physiotherapists and researchers choose the most appropriate measure that best corresponds to their field of interest.These results facilitate the implementation of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health in clinical practice.Use of International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health categories can standardize information on functional health.