Abstract

Auction data often contain information on only the most competitive bids as opposed to all bids. The usual measurement error approaches to unobserved heterogeneity are inapplicable due to dependence among order statistics. We bridge this gap by providing a set of positive results. First, we show that symmetric auctions are identifiable using three consecutive order statistics or two consecutive ones with an instrument. Second, we introduce competition intensity, i.e., the number of bidders, as additional unobserved heterogeneity. Third, we extend our results to asymmetric auctions. Lastly, we apply our methods to U.S. Forest Service timber auctions and find that ignoring unobserved heterogeneity reduces both bidder and auctioneer surplus.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.