Abstract

Tyrosinases (TYRs) catalyze the hydroxylation of phenols and the oxidation of the resulting o‐diphenols to o‐quinones, while catechol oxidases (COs) exhibit only the latter activity. Aurone synthase (AUS) is not able to react with classical tyrosinase substrates, such as tyramine and l‐tyrosine, while it can hydroxylate its natural substrate isoliquiritigenin. The structural difference of TYRs, COs, and AUS at the heart of their divergent catalytic activities is still a puzzle. Therefore, a library of 39 mutants of AUS from Coreopsis grandiflora (CgAUS) was generated and the activity studies showed that the reactivity of the three conserved histidines (HisA2, HisB1, and HisB2) is tuned by their adjacent residues (HisB1+1, HisB2+1, and waterkeeper residue) either to react as stronger bases or / and to stabilize a position permissive for substrate proton shuffling. This provides the understanding for C−H activation based on the type‐III copper center to be used in future biotechnological processes.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.