7-days of FREE Audio papers, translation & more with Prime
7-days of FREE Prime access
7-days of FREE Audio papers, translation & more with Prime
7-days of FREE Prime access
https://doi.org/10.1097/md.0000000000040736
Copy DOIJournal: Medicine | Publication Date: Nov 29, 2024 |
License type: cc-by-nc |
Glioblastomas (GBM) is a kind of malignant brain tumor with poor prognosis. Identifying new biomarkers is promising for the treatment of GBM. The mRNA-seq and clinical data were obtained from The Cancer Genome Atlas and the Chinese Glioma Genome Atlas databases. The differentially expressed genes were identified using limma R package. The prognosis-related genes were screened out and a risk model was constructed using univariate, least absolute shrinkage and selection operator, and multivariate Cox analysis. Receiver operating characteristic curve was used to assess the efficiency of model. Kaplan-Meier survival curve was applied for the survival analysis. Mutation analysis was conducted using maftools package. The effect of immunotherapy was analyzed according to TIDE score, and the drug sensitivity analysis was performed. The Gene Ontology, Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes, and Gene Set Enrichment Analysis enrichment analyses were performed for the functional analysis. The regulatory network was constructed by STRING and Cytoscape software. RT-qPCR was performed to validate the expression of 3 hub genes in vitro. A risk model was constructed based on 3 ion channels related genes (gap junction protein beta 2 [GJB2], potassium voltage-gated channel subfamily h member 6 [KCNH6], and potassium calcium-activated channel subfamily n member 4 [KCNN4]). The risk score and hub genes were positively correlated with the calcium signaling pathway. Patients were divided into 2 groups based on the risk score calculated by 3 signatures. The infiltration levels of T cell, B lineage, monocytic lineage, and neutrophils were increased in high risk group, while TIDE score was decreased. IC50 of potential drugs for GBM treatment was elevated in the high risk group. Furthermore, GJB2, KCNH6, and KCNN4 were oncogenic, and GJB2 and KCNN4 were upregulated, while KCNH6 was downregulated in high risk group and GBM cells. The regulatory network showed that KCNH6 was targeted by more miRNA and transcription factors and KCNN4 interacted with more drugs. We constructed a three-signature risk model, which could effectively predict the prognosis of GBM development. Besides, KCNH6 and KCNN4 were respectively considered as the targets of molecular targeted treatment and chemotherapy.
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.