Abstract
This study compared the intelligibility of native and foreign-accented American English speech presented in quiet and mixed with two different levels of background noise. Two native American English speakers and two native Mandarin Chinese speakers for whom English is a second language read three 50-word lists of phonetically balanced words (Stuart, 2004). The words were mixed with noise at three different signal-to-noise levels—no noise (quiet), SNR + 10 dB (signal 10 dB louder than noise) and SNR 0 (signal and noise at equal loudness). These stimuli were presented to ten native American English listeners who were simply asked to repeat the words they heard the speakers say. Listener response latencies were measured. The results showed that for both native and accented speech, response latencies increased as the noise level increased. For words identified correctly, response times to accented speech were longer than for native speech but the noise conditions affected both types equally. For words judged incorrectly, however, the noise conditions increased latencies for accented speech more than for native speech. Overall, these results support the notion that processing accented speech requires more cognitive effort than processing native speech.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.