Abstract

This paper presents the modeling, system identification, simulation and flight testing of the airbrake of an unmanned experimental aircraft in frame of the FLEXOP H2020 EU project. As the aircraft is equipped with a jet engine with slow response an airbrake is required to increase deceleration after speeding up the aircraft for flutter testing in order to remain inside the limited airspace granted by authorities for flight testing. The airbrake consists of a servo motor, an opening mechanism and the airbrake control surface itself. After briefly introducing the demonstrator aircraft, the airbrake design and the experimental test benches the article gives in depth description of the modeling and system identification referencing also previous work. System identification consists of the determination of the highly nonlinear (saturated and load dependent) servo actuator dynamics and the nonlinear aerodynamic and mechanical characteristics including stiffness and inertia effects. New contributions relative to the previous work are a unified servo angular velocity limit model considering opening against the load or closing with it, the detailed construction and evaluation of airbrake normal and drag force models considering the whole deflection and aircraft airspeed range, the presentation of a unified aerodynamic - mechanic nonlinearity model giving direct relation between airbrake angle, dynamic pressure and servo torque and the transfer function-based modeling of stiffness and inertial effects in the mechanism. The identified servo dynamical model includes system delay, inner saturation, the aforementioned load dependent angular velocity limit model and a transfer function model. The servo model was verified based-on test bench measurements considering the whole opening angle and dynamic load range of the airbrake. New, unpublished measurements with gradually increasing servo load as the servo moves are also considered to verify the model in more realistic circumstances. Then the full airbrake model is constructed and tested in simulation to check realistic behavior. In the next step the airbrake model integrated into the nonlinear simulation model of the FLEXOP aircraft is tested by flying simulated test trajectories with the baseline controller of the aircraft in software-in-the-loop (SIL) Matlab simulation. First, the standalone airbrake simulation is compared to the SIL results to verify flawless integration of airbrake model into the nonlinear aircraft simulation. Then deceleration times with and without airbrake are compared underlining the usefulness of the airbrake in the test mission. Finally, real flight data is used to verify and update the airbrake model and show the effectiveness of the airbrake.

Highlights

  • The FLEXOP EU H2020 research project [2] targeted to develop an experimental aircraft with interchangeable wings (a rigid, a flexible and an aeroelasticallyJ Intell Robot Syst (2020) 100:259–287 tailored) to test modeling and control possibilities of wing flutter and extend the flutter limit speed with active control.During the planned test flights the aircraft should fly a racetrack pattern with two turns and two straight sections

  • This paper presents the modeling and system identification of the airbrake of an unmanned experimental aircraft

  • The applied test benches are briefly described which are a full scale mock-up and a servo test bench with load motor. From this point the work focuses on the identification of the servo dynamics based on test bench measurements first pulling out the significant nonlinearities from the system. These include the characterization of the load dependent opening and closing angular velocities and the estimation of the saturation level of servo angular velocity reference input

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The FLEXOP EU H2020 research project [2] targeted to develop an experimental aircraft (see Fig. 1) with interchangeable wings (a rigid, a flexible and an aeroelasticallyJ Intell Robot Syst (2020) 100:259–287 tailored) to test modeling and control possibilities of wing flutter and extend the flutter limit speed with active control.During the planned test flights the aircraft should fly a racetrack pattern (see Fig. 3) with two turns and two straight sections. One of the straight sections is the test leg where the aircraft should speed up to a given higher reference speed and slow down. As it has a BF Turbines BF300 jet engine with slow dynamics (5s run-up time from idle to full power) a high bandwidth additional actuator is required to make higher decelerations possible. To satisfy this requirement an airbrake was designed [16]. Complete identification of the airbrake requires to mathematically model all of the static (such as the ratio from airbrake torque to servo torque) and dynamic characteristics (such as servo motor dynamics)

Objectives
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call