Abstract

Although Aurantii Fructus (AF) and Aurantii Fructus Immaturus (AFI) are both the fruits of the same rutaceae plant at different stages of growth, they exert similar yet distinct clinical effects. The chemical composition is crucial for quality control as well as therapeutic application. To address this concern, it is significant to evaluate the similarities and differences of the constituents in both AF and AFI. The extract of AF and AFI were comprehensively analyzed by ultra fast liquid chromatography-photodiode array detector-triple-time of flight-tandem mass spectrometry (UFLC-DAD-Triple TOF-MS/MS). Among the 40 compounds detected, 19 metabolites were detected in both the AF and AFI; whereas 13 compounds were only detected in AF and five constituents were exclusively detected in AFI. In particular, even in AFI, three compounds were only identified in AFI (Citrus aurantium’ L. and its cultivar). Among the 18 compounds confirmed by standard database, 13 compounds were reported in AF and AFI for the first time. Furthermore, the distinction was also revealed by the content of naringin, hesperidin, neohesperidin, and synephrine. The study directly contributed to the similarities and differences of AF and AFI. Herein, similarities and the differences in chemical profiles of AF and AFI could explain the current clinical applications.

Highlights

  • Aurantii Fructus (AF) and Aurantii Fructus Immaturus (AFI) are commonly applied medicinal herbs in Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) practice for thousands of years

  • Citrus aurantium’ L. and its cultivar, while AFI is the dried immature fruit of Citrus aurantium’ L. and its cultivar, or Citrus sinensis (L.) Osbeck collected from May to June

  • 11 standards, 18 compounds were identified in AF and AFI by standard database

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Aurantii Fructus (AF) and Aurantii Fructus Immaturus (AFI) are commonly applied medicinal herbs in Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) practice for thousands of years. AF and AFI are collected at different stages of fruit growth with diverse clinical efficacy, are recorded in the Chinese Pharmacopoeia as two distinct medicinal materials [1]. It is of great interest to investigate the underlying compounds present in AF and AFI collected from the same plant source that exhibit diverse pharmacological and clinical effects. It is well-known that the efficacy of herbal medicines is significantly correlated with chemical composition. To compare the similarities and differences of AF/AFI comprehensively, it is necessary to evaluate their chemical composition in larger scale and accuracy. The differences in the above chemical compositions probably explain different clinical effects

Results and Discussion
Characterization of Organic Acids
Characterization of Alkaloids
Characterization of Flavonoids
Characterization of Coumarins
Characterization of Triterpenoids
Data Analysis
Methodology Validation
Reagents and Materials
Standard Solutions and Sample Preparation
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call