Identificar el pie de riesgo en pacientes con diabetes. Un espacio de mejora en atención primaria

Abstract

GoalsIdentify conditioning factors of the foot risk (FR) by comparing two evaluation methods (qualitative and quantitative) for neuropathy, arteriopathy, foot deformities. Concordance between detected the alterations and registered in clinical history (CH). Material and methodsIt is an observational study. Ambit: in two primary care centers of the Catalan Health Institute. PopulationFive hundred thirty-two patients with diabetes, both >18 years with FR records and informed consent. MeasurementsNeuropathy: symptom assessment (NSS) and signs of disability (NDS). Arteriopathy: Index ABI. Edinburgh Questionnaire, fart pulses. Foot deformities: Pedigraphy. Quantitative reference: Values Defined neuropathy: NDS>6 points or 3-5 and NSS>5 points. ITBNormal value (.90-1.30). ResultsWomen, 46.42%. Middle ages, 67.29 years (SD 7.69). One hundred fifty-three patients did not present neurovascular alterations. QualitativeWithout differentiating clinical manifestations: 252, patients presented neuropathy; 99, altered ITB; 28, two complications and 101, Edinburgh Quiz: altered. QuantitativeDifferentiating clinical manifestations: among the neuropathy group; 110, patients only presented symptoms; 46, definite neuropathy. In 96, NDS and NSS scores without defined neuropathy criteria. Altered ABI52, only ABI>1.30; 47, ABI<.90; 12, associated neuropathy and ABI>1.30 and 16, with ABI<.90. Edinburgh questionnaire: 47, presented atypical symptoms and 26, typical.Agreement, between quantitative and recorded neurovascular alterations r=.32 for neuropathy and r=.21 in arteriopathy. The pressure point on the 5th metatarsal, was associated with quantitative neuropathy: OR: 2.32 (1.188–4.546), P=.01. ConclusionThe evaluation, identifying clinical manifestations, improves the identification of FR, although we need more research.