Abstract
Byline: K. Kumar Sir, The efforts to include disabled psychiatrically ill individuals in the ambit of the welfare programs for the disabled in India have a delayed start and a long checkered course. Psychiatrists and other mental health workers had been making ardent appeals and personal efforts in discrete and discontinuous ways, to seek parity of disabled mentally ill persons with mentally retarded and physically disabled persons. Since the 1960s and 1970s, the union and state governments, parliament and state assemblies, and socially committed conscientious citizens started talking on and taking up the cause of disabled persons' care, support, and sustenance, on the line of welfare programs prevailing and prospering in developed nations. During the 1980s and 1990s, the concern and care for the disabled individuals gained attention from the health sector and social welfare sector. The Social Welfare Ministry (as it was called then) of Government of India started to convene meetings on drafting a suitable comprehensive act, incorporating welfare programs for physically disabled persons. Mental retardation also was brought into the gamut of disabilities, thanks to the effort of pioneers in the field of care of persons with mental retardation. Some of us who had been active at the Indian Psychiatric Society at those times addressed the Social Welfare Ministry and got invited to attend the meetings meant for evolving disability welfare programs. Along with many seniors like Dr. A. Venkoba Rao, Dr. S. M. Channabasavanna, Dr. M. Sarada Menon, Dr. L. P. Shah, some juniors like me also had the privilege of attending such meetings. I distinctly remember Sri. Pandey, the then joint secretary, Social Welfare Department, a very perceptive officer who was the coordinator/convener for most of these meetings that were attended by professionals, community leaders, and legal experts. Although we could convey, and to some extent, convince them about the genuine need and justification of including chronic mentally ill persons in the catchment for welfare programs, lack of a scale to evaluate and quantify behavioral and social disability of these patients emerged as a major, or even an absolute hurdle in accepting them, on par with other disabled individuals, defined well. Although the Persons with Disabilities Act (PDA) 1995 included chronic mentally ill as the last category of disabilities, lack of a scale for evaluation and grading psychiatric disability made it impossible for the government to extend disability assistance benefits under PDA for our disabled patients on par with other disabled persons. The utmost and urgent felt need for such an evaluation and scoring scale for psychiatrically disabled persons loomed large, in front of Indian psychiatrists and the IPS for few years since then. In 2001, at the Annual National Conference Indian Psychiatric Society (ANCIPS) Pune, a Task Force, with Dr. Thara (Scarf, Chennai) as chairperson and Dr. T. Murali (National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences [NIMHANS]) as convener, was constituted for preparing such a scale, and the task was taken up on an urgent pace to be completed in an year. Galvanized as the premium project of the IPS for the year, it was earnestly taken up by the task force. Dr. S. Nambi, the then secretary general of IPS extended his valuable help in coordinating the work. Despite some operational difficulties and financial limitations, the Task Force did a commendable work in evolving the draft of the Indian Disability Evaluation and Assessment Scale (IDEAS) and field-tested it in ten centers across the country. In the inauguration of ANCIPS 2002 at Kolkata, I had the pleasant privilege of releasing the IDEAS, fulfilling the mission initiated as IPS President in ANCIPS, Pune, in 2001. …
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.