Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this study is to determine the ideal legal arrangements for social assistance fund management to prevent corruption, and efforts to prevent and overcome corruption in social assistance funds. Research Methodology: The method used is normative juridical research using a statutory approach, a conceptual approach, and a sociological juridical approach. Results: The results showed that the ideal legal arrangement for the management of social assistance funds to prevent corruption is to apply some positive legal principles from John Austin such as being based on clear authorities such as legislative or government institutions, and the law must reflect state sovereignty, set clear rules and must be followed by all parties, Provide a foundation for strong and effective law enforcement, and the law can act as an instrument of control to prevent criminal acts of corruption. Efforts to prevent and overcome corruption of social assistance funds are through the application of Jeremy Bentham's theory of utilitarianism which has the main principle of maximizing overall social welfare or happiness, considering the distribution of benefits fairly, emphasizing transparency and accountability in decision making, and emphasizing transparency and accountability in decision making.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: Journal of Multidisciplinary Academic and Practice Studies
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
