Abstract
This study aims to describe the ideal concept of application of formal terms in the settlement of disputes on the results of the election of the head area in the Indonesian Constitutional Court. This study focuses on the idea that the Constitutional Court as a guardian of the constitution and democracy must be subject to the constitution as the highest law in the Unitary State of the Republic of Indonesia. From 2008 to 2021, the Constitutional Court has exercised this authority in (2) two periods, namely when the settlement of disputes over the results of the regional head elections in the general election regime in 2008 to 2013 and the regional government regime from 2015 to 2021. Methods in the study This research uses the type of doctrinal research method, which in terms of its nature, this research is a descriptive research, which is a research that describes something in terms of certain space and time.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
