Abstract

Telecommunication reforms in India saw very little privatization and much more of market liberalization accompanied with the introduction of new laws and regulations. Regulatory agencies and regulation have become integral components of the telecom reform process, in order to protect consumers, reassure investors and, in theory, help advance competition. In a country like India the role of the regulator is much beyond regulation of segments that are potentially monopolistic but its performance should also be measured in terms of its ability to foster competition. Studies have shown a close relationship between the nature of a regulatory regime and the investment behavior of the firms subject to that regime. Changes in regulation have often been followed by changes in investment behavior (Graeme Guthrie, 2006).The results of liberalization have been impressive. Teledensity has increased from merely 2 percent or so in 1999 to around 61 percent in 2010 and almost 8-10 million mobile subscribers are added every month. Wireless has been the principal engine for telecom growth in the country. The wireless subscriber base has grown from 0.88 million in1999 to 687.71 million in 2010-11. Given that the mobile sector grew at the Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) of 84 .01 percent in the last decade, the telecom subscriber base has already outstripped what was envisaged for the 11th Plan ending in 2102.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.