Abstract

Starting from the practical problem that identifying objects and narratives in text (the levels of description and iconography) often depends on our understanding of higher-level contexts (the level of culture or iconology), I suggest a way to calibrate lower-level analysis to higher-level without circularity or arbitrary top-down hunches. The theoretical framework is that of propositional attitudes, mental states accompanying the entertaining of thought contents, which determine just how actors regard the lower-level perceptual data that interests us. I examine this tool in a classic eleventh-century text, the proof of God’s existence in Anselm’s Proslogion, then apply it to an iconographically distinctive fresco in Anselm’s memorial chapel at Canterbury. Finally I suggest that paying attention to rational psychology, in the sense of attitude to thought content, can make art historical ascent from formal to cultural facts more reliable, and aptly underline its fallibility.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.