Ibn Abd Al-Hadi’s Fundamentalist Opinions on the Disputed Evidence

Abstract

In this study, I will demonstrate the disputed evidence according to the scholar Ibn Abd al-Hadi, may God Almighty have mercy on him, and his approach in presenting this evidence with ease, comfort, and brevity that some may see as a misleading abbreviation, but when researching the fundamentals of jurisprudence, you will discover that the principle in this venerable science is the clarification of the fundamentalist rules upon which much is built, among the jurisprudential subjects. Thus, the expansion in explaining and justifying these rules and the use of many examples in explaining each rule is within the jurisdiction of the science of jurisprudence. Each school of jurisprudence has jurisprudential philosophies that differ from the others in the methodology of writing and composing. Because of the meaning of this evidence in many rulings, you will uncover expansion. Scientists have clarified this evidence to make it easier for people to understand it correctly by distinguishing its importance in many new matters. This is in contrast to what Ibn Abd al-Hadi states concerning the summary and brevity of this evidence. You sometimes find him satisfied with mentioning only the definition, and an example of this is what he revealed in approval and extrapolation.