Abstract

The previous literature has suggested that the iatrogenic atrial septal defects (IASDs) may follow left atrial (LA) access by transseptal (TS) puncture, especially in the case of a single TS for more than one catheter. The aim of the present study is to describe the prevalence of patent foramen ovale (PFO) and IASDs in a cohort of atrial fibrillation (AF) patients undergoing redo catheter ablation (CA) procedures in a high-volume centre accessing LA by a standardized single TS puncture. Patients (n = 197) who underwent at least one redo AFCA, between 2004 and 2012, were retrospectively enroled. Transoesophageal echocardiography was performed before each procedure during which LA was accessed via a PFO, if present, or by single TS for both the mapping and ablation catheters. At baseline, PFO was detected in 43 (21.8%) patients. Clinical and echocardiographic parameters recorded did not differ within patients presenting with or without PFO. Left atrium was accessed via PFO in 39 (90.7% of those with PFO) patients during the first procedure. New-onset IASD occurred in 11 (5.6%) patients following the first procedure and in 1 (2.2%) patient following the second procedure. The clinical and echocardiographic parameters did not differ within the patients irrespective of whether IASD was reported or not. No TS-related complications occurred. In the present cohort, LA access by PFO or single TS for both the mapping and ablation catheters lead to a small risk of asymptomatic IASD, not increased by redo procedures, confirming that it represents a safe approach. No clinical and/or echocardiographic parameters seemed to predict IASD occurrence.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.