Abstract

Abstract. In this study, a full description and comprehensive evaluation of a global–regional nested model, the Aerosol and Atmospheric Chemistry Model of the Institute of Atmospheric Physics (IAP-AACM), is presented for the first time. Not only are the global budgets and distribution explored, but comparisons of the nested simulation over China against multiple datasets are investigated, which benefit from access to Chinese air quality monitoring data from 2013 to the present and the “Model Inter-Comparison Study for Asia” project. The model results and analysis can help reduce uncertainties and aid with understanding model diversity with respect to assessing global and regional aerosol effects on climate and human health, especially over East Asia and areas affected by East Asia. For the global simulation, the 1-year simulation for 2014 shows that the IAP-AACM is within the range of other models. Overall, it reasonably reproduced spatial distributions and seasonal variations of trace gases and aerosols in both surface concentrations and column burdens (mostly within a factor of 2). The model captured spatial variation for carbon monoxide well with a slight underestimation over ocean, which implicates the uncertainty of the ocean source. The simulation also matched the seasonal cycle of ozone well except for the continents in the Northern Hemisphere, which was partly due to the lack of stratospheric–tropospheric exchange. For aerosols, the simulation of fine-mode particulate matter (PM2.5) matched observations well. The simulation of primary aerosols (normalized mean biases, NMBs, are within ±0.64) is better than that of secondary aerosols (NMB values are greater than 1.0 in some regions). For the nested regional simulation, the IAP-AACM shows the superiority of higher-resolution simulation using the nested domain over East Asia. The model reproduced variation of sulfur dioxide (SO2), nitrogen dioxide (NO2), and PM2.5 accurately in typical cities, with correlation coefficients (R) above 0.5 and NMBs within ±0.5. Compared with the global simulation, the nested simulation exhibits an improved ability to capture the high temporal and spatial variability over China. In particular, the R values for SO2, NO2 and PM2.5 are increased by ∼0.15, ∼0.2, and ∼0.25 respectively in the nested grid. Based on the evaluation and analysis, future model improvements are suggested.

Highlights

  • Atmospheric composition can affect climate and environment via direct and indirect effects (Houghton et al, 2001)

  • With better model performance and a more robust observation network, AR5 achieved increasing confidence in the assessment compared with AR4 (Boucher et al, 2013); radiative forcing associated with aerosols still has large uncertainties

  • The model reproduces the annual distribution of O3 well, with a NMB ranging from −0.34 to 0.1, except in Asia

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Atmospheric composition can affect climate and environment via direct and indirect effects (Houghton et al, 2001). Wei et al.: IAP-AACM v1.0 position (Mathur and Dennis, 2003), atmospheric oxidation (Calvert, 1984), and gas–particle transformation processes (Saxena and Seigneur, 1987) Aerosols formatted from these precursor gases, in addition to aerosols from other sources, have a direct radiative forcing. The development of the IAP-AACM allows us to quantify climate effects on a global scale and elucidate air pollution problems on a regional scale over China. Continuous year-round observations at city sites can help with the study of air pollution and model evaluation in China. The off-line IAP-AACM is applied to a 1-year simulation for 2014, and the model results of trace gases and aerosol mass concentration are evaluated against other model datasets and a wide range of observational datasets, including site observations and satellite data. An inter-comparison with the Model Inter-Comparison Study for Asia (MICSAsia) models is presented in Sect. 3.3, to give a general comparison across EA

CAS-ESM
IAP-AACM
IAP-AACM set-up
Emissions
Meteorology and evaluation
Observation data
Budgets
Global distribution and evaluation
Trace gases
Aerosol composition
Comparison with satellite data
Distribution of pollutants in EA
Trace gas evaluation in cities
Aerosol composition evaluation in cities
Findings
Conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call