Abstract

Procrastinating the repayment in full on a month‐to‐month balance in credit card debt is a problem affecting a large segment of the population. This paper studies the role that present‐biased preferences and impatience play in the repayment behaviour of consumers. Evidence from a field study using a sample of 380 college students provides empirical support to the hypothesis that individuals with present‐biased preferences tend to adopt a strategic procrastination repayment behaviour that is not optimal to accomplish repayment in full. More specifically, individuals suffering from self control issues and using credit cards to bridge unexpected shortage of income are more likely to fail to repay credit cards in full in the period after the purchase was completed, therefore, carrying over a month‐to‐month balance. In addition, people with a simple present‐biased revealed effect are also more likely to fall behind on credit card repayment, vis‐à‐vis those that have a higher marginal propensity to save. By the same token, we find that individuals consistently behave inconsistently, that is evidence from our sample indicates the predominance of dynamically inconsistent preferences, in opposition to the prescriptions of the neoclassical theory. In this regard, the naïve type of individuals with present‐bias preferences consume beyond their income capabilities and are much more likely to carry over credit card debt into the next period, vis‐à‐vis individuals that are more sophisticated.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.