Abstract
Two years after the publication of the book aiming to verify whether, and to which extent, Italian judges are sensitive to the suggestions of the economic analysis of law (EAL), the two authors update their account and try to strike a first, interlocutory balance. The comment of four new, and so far unpublished judicial opinions concerning the areas of contracts, torts and property rights offers the opportunity to draw some further insights about the effects - positive, not only from the judicial standpoint - stemming from the confrontation between judges and the economic analysis of (private) law.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
