Abstract

The empirical literature on prisoner reentry has documented what factors assist in reentry, but these scholars tend to conceptualize reentry as a dichotomous variable: One indicates “successful” reentry and zero is failure to reenter, as measured by re-arrest, re-conviction or re-incarceration, which raises interesting questions about the “gray area” between success and failure. This manuscript aims to analytically disaggregate this binary comparison to explore reentry as a complex lived experience in the “gray area,” which cannot be easily captured by a simple formula. Because reentry largely exists in the “gray area,” methodological pluralism, comprising of in-depth interviews, ethnography, participant-observations, and archival research, is utilized to conceptualize reentry as an embedded micro-level experience informed and shaped by a felony conviction and macro-level policies. By understanding reentry as a lived experience, I reveal the “gray zone” and its implications for why reentry is so challenging.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.