Abstract

From a neuropsychological point of view, hypotheses are offered on the possible action of the brain in the processing of mnemonic information for long-term storage (or for retrieval of long-term stored information). It is argued that strict relations between damage of circumscribed brain structures and amnesia, as they have been suggested in recent case reports, are questionable for several reasons: Firstly, the involved regions differ between cases; secondly, there is some counter-evidence from other cases in which similar neuronal damage failed to result in lasting amnesic disturbances; thirdly, it is hypothesized that even from circumscribed brain damage it is not justifiable to conclude that the lesioned structure is solely or principally responsible for the observed mnemonic changes, as the brain acts in an integrative way, that is, on the basis of a wide-spread network of neuronal information processing. On the basis of these and related arguments, hypotheses and models on mnemonic information processing in the intact and in the damaged brain are derived. With these hypotheses even the frequent observation of interindividual differences in mnemonic information processing finds a possible explanation which is in conformity to known anatomical circuits and connections and to principles of neuronal coding.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.