Abstract

Cancer is an emerging public health problem in Africa. According to the World Health Organization, the numbers will be doubled by 2030 because of the ageing and the growth of the population. Prostate cancer is the most common cancer among men in most African countries. Radiotherapy machines are extremely limited in Africa and therefore prostate cancer in Africa is mostly managed by urologists. However, for a large proportion of prostate cancer patients, external-beam radiotherapy (EBRT) will be the treatment of choice in Africa because of limitations of surgical expertise in many countries. The disparity between the <em>α/β</em> ratio for late complications and the low <em>α/β</em> ratio for prostate cancer widens the therapeutic window when treating prostate cancer with hypofractionation. Because of the reduced number of treatment days, hypofractionation offers economic and logistic advantages, reducing the burden of the very limited radiotherapy resources in most African countries. It also increases patient convenience. A misleading assumption is that high-level radiotherapy is not feasible in low-income countries. The gold standard option for hypofractionation includes daily image-guided radiotherapy with 3–4 implanted gold fiducials. Acceptable methods for image guidance include ultrasound and cone-beam computed tomography (CT). CT-based treatment planning with magnetic resonance imaging fusion allows for accurate volume delineation. Volumetric modulated arc therapy or inversely planned intensity modulated radiotherapy is the ideal for treatment delivery. The most vital component is safe delivery, which necessitates accurate quality assurance measures and on-board imaging. We will review the evidence and potential utilisation of hypofractionated EBRT in Africa.

Highlights

  • Cancer is an emerging public health problem in Africa

  • Radiotherapy machines are extremely limited in Africa and prostate cancer in Africa is mostly managed by urologists

  • The CHHiP trial did not find any difference in late toxicity between the arms and the authors concluded that their hypofractionated regimen of 60 Gy in 3-Gy fractions should be considered as new standard of care for external-beam radiotherapy (EBRT) of localised prostate cancer.[7]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Cancer is an emerging public health problem in Africa. According to the World Health Organization (WHO), the numbers will be doubled by 2030 because of the ageing and the growth of the population. In terms of late toxicity, both the RTOG 0415 and the HYPRO trials demonstrated increased grade ≥ 2 bowel and bladder toxicity with hypofractionated EBRT as compared to conventional treatment.[6,8] In contrast, the CHHiP trial did not find any difference in late toxicity between the arms and the authors concluded that their hypofractionated regimen of 60 Gy in 3-Gy fractions should be considered as new standard of care for EBRT of localised prostate cancer.[7] The increase in late toxicity in the HYPRO trial was limited; for example, grade 3 nocturia (≥ 6 times/night) was reported in 19% after hypofractionation versus 13% in the conventional arm.[6] It is questionable whether these differences are clinically relevant.

Schedule
Findings
Conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call