Abstract
A large variety of algorithms have been proposed for hyperspectral data classification in the literature. Among them, classical forest methods, such as bagged tree, random forest, oblique random forest, and rotation forest, have received much attention, thanks to their efficiency. Recently, two filter-based forest methods, called balanced filter-based forest (BFF) and cost-sensitive filter-based forest (CFF), have been proposed for high-dimensional data classification. These methods also have the solutions for imbalanced data problem. In this paper, these two methods were examined and compared with the classical forest methods for the classification of several well-known imbalanced hyperspectral datasets. The results indicated higher efficiency and reliability of the filter-based forests as compared to the classical forests. Moreover, they were smaller and sparser ensembles than the competitors. Furthermore, these two forests (especially BFF) were generally more successful for the classification of minority classes in hyperspectral datasets.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.