Abstract

The isometric mapping (Isomap) algorithm is often used for analysing hyperspectral images. Isomap allows to reduce such hyperspectral images from a high-dimensional space into a lower-dimensional space, keeping the critical original information. To achieve such objective, Isomap uses the state-of-the-art MultiDimensional Scaling method (MDS) for dimensionality reduction. In this work, we propose to use Isomap with SMACOF, since SMACOF is the most accurate MDS method. A deep comparison, in terms of accuracy, between Isomap based on an eigen-decomposition process and Isomap based on SMACOF has been carried out using three benchmark hyperspectral images. Moreover, for the hyperspectral image classification, three classifiers (support vector machine, k-nearest neighbour, and Random Forest) have been used to compare both Isomap approaches. The experimental investigation has shown that better classification accuracy is obtained by Isomap with SMACOF.

Highlights

  • HyperSpectral Images (HSIs) contain an exhaustive variety of information about specific characteristics of the materials, with hundreds or even thousands bands (Borengasser et al, 2007)

  • Such an investigation methodology has been considered in this work: first, to run isometric mapping (Isomap) based on SMACOF or eigen-decomposition methods and, after that, to apply a classification process with Support Vector Machine (SVM), KNN or Random Forest classifiers

  • Obtained results of Isomap using SMACOF are compared with the obtained results of a recent paper where Isomap considers an eigen-decomposition process (Li et al, 2017) in the problem of hyperspectral images reduction

Read more

Summary

Introduction

HyperSpectral Images (HSIs) contain an exhaustive variety of information about specific characteristics of the materials, with hundreds or even thousands bands (Borengasser et al, 2007). The main contribution of this paper is the use of Isomap based on SMACOF (Scaling by MAjorizing a COmplicated), which is considered to be the most accurate MDS method (Borg and Groenen, 2005), and used when solving various MDS problems in social and behavioural sciences, marketing, biometrics, and ecology. It is one of the most computationally demanding methods (Ingram et al, 2009).

Isomap
15: Reorder v in Q
SMACOF
356 4. Evaluation Results
Conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call