Hyperopic SMILE Versus FS-LASIK: A Biomechanical Comparison in Human Fellow Corneas

Abstract

PURPOSE: To investigate the biomechanical properties of ex vivo human paired corneas after hyperopic correction via cap-based versus flap-based laser-assisted refractive surgery. METHODS: In this prospective experimental study, 13 pairs of human corneas unsuitable for transplantation were equally divided into two groups. The pachymetry was performed in each eye just before the laser procedure. Corneas from the right eye were treated with small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE), whereas corneas from the left eye of the same donor were treated with femtosecond laser–assisted laser in situ keratomileusis (FS-LASIK). All corneas were subjected to a refractive correction of +6.00 diopters (D) sphere with a 6.5-mm zone under a 120-µm cap (SMILE) or a 7-mm zone under a 110-µm flap (FS-LASIK). For two-dimensional biomechanical measurements, the corneoscleral buttons underwent two testing cycles (preconditioning stress-strain curve from 0.03 to 9.0 N and stress-relaxation at 9.0 N during 120 seconds) to analyze the elastic and viscoelastic material properties. The effective elastic modulus was calculated. Statistical analysis was performed with a confidence interval of 95%. RESULTS: In stress-strain measurements, the effective elastic modulus was not significantly different ( P > .311) between SMILE (13.5 ± 12.8 MPa) and FS-LASIK (7.56 ± 17.9 MPa). In stress-relaxation measurements, the remaining stress was not significantly different ( P = .841) between SMILE (124 ± 20 kPa) and FS-LASIK (126 ± 21 kPa). CONCLUSIONS: Unlike myopic correction, after hyperopic correction the cap-based procedure (SMILE) and the flap-based technique (FS-LASIK) may be considered equivalent in terms of biomechanical stability when measured experimentally in ex vivo human fellow eye corneas. [ J Refract Surg . 2021;37(12):810–815.]