Abstract

When the masonry walls of buildings under heritage protection need to be restored and thermally improved, the only option is to use an interior insulation system. This is also the riskiest method of insulating walls in cold climates. Capillary active interior insulation systems have been proven to be the most reliable, minimizing the risk of mold growth and decay caused by condensation. They have also been proven to be less risky in wind-driven rain. The building studied is situated in a heritage-conservation area in downtown Tartu, Estonia, and therefore cannot be insulated from the exterior. This paper compares the hygrothermal performance of four different interior insulation systems with and without a heating cable and vapor barrier. In the first case, Isover Vario KM Duplex UV was placed between reed panels. In the second case, reed panels were used without the vapor barrier. Data loggers were applied between the reed panels and the original wall and inside the room to measure temperature and relative humidity in one-hour intervals. Exterior temperature and relative humidity values were taken from the Estonian University of Life Sciences Institute of Technology weather service station. In addition to the measurements taken in the case study building, calculations were made using heat-air-moisture (HAM) Delphin software to simulate the situation. The use of a smart vapor retarder (Isover Vario KM Duplex UV) with reed panels in the interior insulation system reduced the relative humidity level inside the wall. The vapor retarder improved the drying-potential compared to the interior insulation system without the vapor barrier.

Highlights

  • Society is becoming more aware of the need to reduce greenhouse gas emissions

  • The vapor retarder improved the drying-potential compared to the interior insulation system without the vapor barrier

  • The purpose of this study was to determine whether reed panels combined with smart vapor retarder pose a risk of mold and whether the heating cable helps prevent mold

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Society is becoming more aware of the need to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. To achieve this goal, Estonia needs to lower its greenhouse gas emissions by 80% by 2050 compared to emission levels in 1990 [1]. There is currently no regulation of materials used in retrofitting. Some materials may contain large amounts of embodied energy and will not be efficient at conserving energy. The General Principles of Climate Policy until 2050 resolution calls attention to modeling climate-friendly approaches and environmentally friendly solutions to lowering greenhouse gas emissions [1]. Low amounts of energy are used to produce the insulation material described in this paper

Objectives
Methods
Results
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call