Hydroponic Lettuce Production Using Treated Post-Hydrothermal Liquefaction Wastewater (PHW)

Samuel D Jesse,Yuanhui Zhang,Paul C Davidson,Andrew J Margenot

doi:10.3390/su11133605

Samuel D Jesse, Yuanhui Zhang + Show 2 more

Open Access

https://doi.org/10.3390/su11133605

Copy DOI

Journal: Sustainability	Publication Date: Jun 30, 2019
Citations: 15	License type: CC BY 4.0

Affiliation: University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign

Abstract

Post-hydrothermal liquefaction wastewater (PHW) is a byproduct of the hydrothermal liquefaction (HTL) process. Previous research indicates that PHW is free of pathogens and contains nutrients needed for crop growth, but may contain metal(loid)s. This study evaluated the ability of differentially treated PHW for effective and safe hydroponic lettuce production. Water containing only hydroponic fertilizer (Source Water 1) had the highest total dry yield of all five treatments; 3.1 times higher than Source Water 2 (diluted PHW with sand filtration), 3.5 times higher than Source Water 3 (diluted PHW with sand + carbon filtration), 2.6 times higher than Source Water 4 (diluted and nitrified PHW with sand filtration), and 1.3 times higher than Source Water 5 (diluted PHW supplemented with hydroponic fertilizer). Findings also indicated that while PHW was below the US Department of Agriculture Foreign Agriculture Service maximum levels for cadmium, lead, and mercury in food, the concentration of arsenic was 1.6, 2.4, and 2.0 times higher than the maximum level for Source Waters 2, 3, and 4, respectively. There was no detectable E. coli or fecal coliforms in any of the treated PHW. While nitrogen was present in the raw PHW, only 0.03% was NO3-N and NO2-N. Diluted PHW supplemented with hydroponic fertilizer had lower lettuce yield than hydroponic fertilizer alone, indicating a potential non-nutrient inhibition of plant growth by PHW. Therefore, this research demonstrates that treated PHW does not pose a biological contamination risk for lettuce, but may entail levels of arsenic in edible leaf tissues that are in excess of safe levels. Additional treatment of PHW can benefit crop production by allowing crop utilization of a greater fraction of total nitrogen in the raw PHW.

Highlights

The U.S produces an estimated 79 million dry tons of sustainably collectable livestock manure and food processing waste annually [1]
Five different source waters were used to grow lettuce, hydroponically (Table 1); one water source consisting of municipal tap water and hydroponic fertilizer and four water sources consisting of treated post-hydrothermal liquefaction wastewater (PHW)
This study evaluated treated PHW source waters for the production of safe hydroponic lettuce

Summary

Introduction

The U.S produces an estimated 79 million dry tons of sustainably collectable livestock manure and food processing waste annually [1]. This has encouraged a growing interest in hydrothermal liquefaction (HTL), a process by which organic matter, such as sewage or manure, is converted to bio-crude oil under high temperatures and pressures [2]. This process produces an aqueous byproduct that contains crop nutrients including nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium [3]. Compared to non-hydroponic agriculture, hydroponic production requires 82 times more energy but 92% less water and produces 11 times more yield per area [10]

Objectives

Methods

Results

Conclusion