Abstract

Silica or glass particles are introduced in a poly(dimethylsiloxane) (PDMS) matrix for various applications. A particular feature of these systems is that PDMS adsorbs on the surface of the dispersed particles, thus rendering them more hydrophobic with time. The mechanism of this process of in situ hydrophobization is still poorly understood. The major aims of the present study are (1) to quantify the rate of surface hydrophobization by PDMS and, on this basis, to discuss the mechanism of the process; (2) to compare the contact angles of surfaces that are hydrophobized by different procedures and are placed in contact with different fluid interfaces-PDMS-water, hexadecane-water, and air-water; and (3) to check how the type of surfactant affects the contact angles, viz., the effective hydrophobicity of the surface. We present experimental results for the kinetics of hydrophobization of glass surfaces, which are characterized by measuring the three-phase contact angle of glass-surfactant solution-PDMS. The data reveal two consecutive stages in the hydrophobization process: The first stage is relatively fast and the contact angle increases from 0 degrees to about 90 degrees within several minutes. This stage is explained with the physical adsorption of the PDMS chains, as a result of hydrogen-bond formation with the surface silanol groups. The second stage is much slower and hours or days are required at room temperature to reach the final contact angle (typically, 150-160 degrees). This stage is explained as grafting of the PDMS molecules on the surface by chemical reaction with the surface silanol groups. If the glass surface had been pretreated by hexamethyldisilazane (HMDS), so that CH(3) groups had blocked most of the surface silanol groups, the first stage in the hydrophobization process is almost missing-the contact angle slowly changes at room temperature from about 90 degrees up to 120 degrees. The experiments aimed to compare several hydrophobization procedures showed that PDMS ensures larger contact angle (more hydrophobic surface) than grafted alkyl chains. The contact angles at the PDMS-water and hexadecane-water interfaces were found to be very similar to each other, and much larger than that at the air-water interface. Interestingly, we found that the ionic surfactants practically do not affect the contact angle of PDMS-hydrophobized surface, whereas the nonionic surfactants reduce this angle. Similar trends are expected with silica surfaces, as well.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.