Abstract
BackgroundEpidural analgesia/anesthesia is used during surgery because it dramatically relieves pain and attenuates the stress response. Because limited data exist regarding the relative merits of hydromorphone (HM) and fentanyl (FENT), the objective was to determine which was more safe and effective. MethodsProspective case-matched, observational study evaluated elective surgery patients: 30 HM and 60 FENT. Variables were measured perioperatively. ResultsOf the 90 patients, mean age was 52 years; simplified acute physiology score was 26 ± 10; and American Society of Anesthesiologists score was 2.4 HM vs 2.7 FENT, P = .03. HM patients were more apt to be excessively sedated (16% HM vs 1% FENT, P = .007) and have poor mental unresponsiveness (6% HM vs 0% FENT, P = .04). The incidence of hypotension was not different, 76% HM vs 80% FENT, not significant. ConclusionsIn a closely case-matched population, FENT caused less excessive sedation and unresponsiveness. FENT patients had better intraoperative urine output and tended to have less repeated episodes of hypotension.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
