Abstract
While genetically modified plants that secrete histidine acid phosphatases (HAPs), β-propeller phytases (BPPs) and purple acid phosphatases (PAPs) have been shown to assimilate soluble phytate, little is known about whether these plants have the ability to hydrolyze precipitated phytate. In this study, the ability of representative members of these three classes of phytases to hydrolyze metal-phytate salts and to hydrolyze phytate adsorbed to aluminum precipitates was compared. All three phytases were able to hydrolyze Ca 2+-, Mg 2+-, and Mn 2+-phytates, but were unable to hydrolyze Al 3+-, Fe 2+-, Fe 3+-, Cu 2+-, and Zn 2+-phytates. When these ions were present, the hydrolysis of Ca 2+-phytate was prevented. Citrate was more potent than malate and oxalate in solubilizing some of these phytate salts for enzyme hydrolysis. Phytate adsorbed to aluminum precipitates was resistant to all three enzymes, except when organic acids were added (citrate>oxalate>malate). While increasing concentrations of organic acids were inhibitory to enzyme activity (oxalate >citrate>malate), PAP was more resistant to citrate than HAP. As desorption of phytate from a solid surface by organic acids is essential for phytase activity, the genetic engineering of plants that enhances the secretion of both citrate and phytases from the root may be a feasible approach to improving soil phytate assimilation.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.