Hydrogen, methane and one of their fuel blends combustion: CFD analysis and numerical-experimental comparisons of fixed and mobile applications

Abstract

The capabilities of Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) coupled with detailed chemistry simulations are examined in both steady jet diffusion flames and in an internal combustion engine case fuelled with hydrogen. Different approaches to turbulence-chemistry interaction such as the “Laminar Flame Concept” the “Eddy Dissipation Concept” and the “Turbulent Flame Speed Closure” are considered and tested. The results are compared with the experimental data available. Concerning the jet diffusion flames, the combustion processes of hydrogen, methane and one of their fuel blends are investigated on two burner geometries. Different sensitivities (i.e. mesh, turbulence model, turbulent Schmidt number, chemical mechanism) are performed. The study demonstrates that despite the burner geometry considered and the chemical composition of the fuel, the Complex Chemistry with “Eddy Dissipation Concept” is the model that better describes the behaviour of the turbulent flames. On the other hand, the “Laminar Flame Concept” sub-model is characterized by an higher fuel consumption rate, which causes an overestimation of the temperature peak. As for the in-cylinder unsteady simulations, the hydrogen combustion process is better described by the “Turbulent Flame Speed Closure” sub-model, which, unlike the other two, requires the specification of both laminar and turbulent flame speed. Despite different variations being considered, the “Laminar Flame Concept” adoption leads to an unphysically high burning rate, while the Eddy Dissipation Concept sub-model is characterized by an underestimation of the apparent heat release rate, and thus of the pressure peak inside the combustion chamber.