Abstract
The “classical” challenge, raised by Emil Fischer as to why one monosaccharide arylhydrazone adopts a cyclic structure but another an acyclic structure, is answered here. The present comprehensive analysis of hexose and hexosamine arylhydrazones, based on 2D NMR spectroscopy and theoretical modeling, has established that the chain of hydrogen bonds needed for conformational selection can only be completed for d‐glucosamine derivatives. Thus, d‐glucosamine 4‐nitrophenylhydrazone exclusively adopts its cyclic form, but any configurational changes imply the formation of acyclic structures. In conclusion, three criteria dominate structure selection, namely 1) an amino function at the C‐2 position, 2) the “all‐equatorial” substitution mode of the pyranoid ring, and 3) an electron‐withdrawing group on the arylhydrazone are all needed to get the cyclic form only.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.